Clinical notes carry the story of a consult from one decision to the next. For Australian clinicians, a useful note needs to support safe ongoing care, meet the requirements that apply to the setting and remain easy for another practitioner to understand. A consistent approach to content, structure and review helps both clinician-written and AI-drafted notes serve that purpose before they enter the patient record.

What are clinical notes?

A clinical note is the documented account of a healthcare encounter. It records the relevant information reported by the patient, the clinician's findings and reasoning, and the management or follow-up agreed during the consult.

The clinical note is one part of the broader patient health record. The full record can also include demographics, medicines, allergies, test results, referrals, correspondence, care plans and earlier notes. A progress note is a type of clinical note that documents the patient's status and care over time.

Clear clinical notes serve three closely connected purposes:

• Continuity of care: the next clinician can understand what happened, why decisions were made and what needs follow-up.
• Patient safety: relevant allergies, medicines, findings, risks and safety-netting remain visible.
• Professional accountability: the record shows the information available and the reasoning applied at the time.

Avant's retrospective analysis of nearly 16,000 claims and complaints involving member doctors found record issues in one in five matters; 86% involved inadequate or incomplete information. Poor records were associated with below-standard assessments, and some matters could not be defended because records were incomplete or missing. The dataset covered matters finalised from July 2019 to June 2024 and does not represent every Australian clinician.

What should a clinical note include?

The exact content depends on the profession, encounter, workplace and any service-specific requirements. Australian professional standards provide a practical baseline.

For doctors, the Medical Board of Australia's Good medical practice requires accurate, current and legible records that include relevant clinical history, findings, investigations, diagnosis, information given to the patient, medicines, referrals and other management. Records must support continuity of care and be made at the time of events or as soon as possible afterwards. Other registered professions have their own codes or a shared code administered by the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA).

For general practice specifically, the RACGP released its sixth-edition standards in August 2026. General practices can begin using the new guidance for quality improvement, but the National General Practice Accreditation Scheme currently continues to assess practices against the fifth edition during the transition. The fifth edition's Criterion C7.1 therefore remains the current accreditation reference for the content of general practice patient records:

• consultation date and the clinician who made the entry
• mode of consultation, such as in person, telephone or video
• the patient's reason for attending
• relevant history, examination findings and investigations
• allergies
• diagnosis, when appropriate
• the recommended management plan and expected review process
• full details of medicines prescribed, started, ceased or changed
• relevant consent and communications

This is a baseline rather than a script, and the RACGP transition applies to general practice rather than every clinical setting.

For a service attracting a Medicare benefit, Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) General Note GN.15.39 says the record should be adequate and contemporaneous. It must contain clinical information sufficient to explain the service rendered or initiated and be understandable to another practitioner. Individual item descriptors can add requirements, but there is no single MBS note template for every service.

Common clinical note structures and documents compared

A note format is a retrieval aid. It should make the important facts and reasoning easy to find without forcing every consult into the same shape.

These terms do not all describe equivalent structures. Some organise information within a note, while an issues-based approach groups information by clinical problem. A progress note describes the purpose of recording change over time and can use one of several internal structures. A specialist letter is correspondence for another clinician, usually built from the encounter record.

Our SOAP notes guide provides a dedicated template and examples. Choose the lightest structure that makes the encounter clear and add any fields required for the profession, service or workflow.

How to write a clinical note that helps the next clinician

1. Establish the context

Confirm the correct patient record, date, author and consultation mode before writing. State the reason for the encounter early. This prevents a clinically accurate note from being attached to the wrong context.

2. Separate reported information from observed findings

Make the source clear. Phrases such as “patient reports”, “carer states” and “records reviewed” distinguish reported history from direct examination or measurement. Record uncertainty instead of turning it into fact.

3. Include relevant positives and negatives

Capture the details that affected assessment and management. A long transcript can hide the same gaps as a sparse note, so select for clinical relevance rather than length. Relevant negative findings often explain why a particular risk or differential became less likely.

4. Make the reasoning visible

The assessment should connect the history and findings with the plan. It can record a working diagnosis, differential, formulation or the reason for further investigation. Avoid presenting an unconfirmed diagnosis as settled.

5. Make the plan actionable

Record what will happen, who is responsible and when review is expected. Include medicines started, ceased or changed, investigations, referrals, advice and follow-up. When safety-netting is relevant, state the symptoms or changes that should prompt earlier review and the action discussed.

6. Use respectful, precise language

Write factual observations rather than labels or judgement. Use a direct quotation only when the patient's exact words carry clinical meaning. Assume the note may later be read by the patient and by a clinician who was not present.

7. Complete the note promptly

Document during the encounter or as soon as practicable afterwards. If an entry is made later, identify both the encounter date and the actual entry date rather than making it appear contemporaneous.

A concise clinical note example

This fictional progress-note example records change since an earlier encounter without using SOAP headings. The level of detail required in a real note depends on the clinician's findings, scope and setting.

Context: Physiotherapy follow-up for a right ankle sprain, two weeks after the initial assessment.

Progress since last review

• Reports pain of 2/10 at rest and 4/10 when descending stairs.
• Swelling has reduced. No new injury, numbness or weakness reported.
• Completed the home exercises on five of the past seven days.

Findings today

• Mild lateral ankle swelling.
• Active dorsiflexion 12 degrees, compared with 8 degrees at the previous review.
• Single-leg stance 20 seconds, compared with 8 seconds at the previous review.

Progress assessment

• Pain, swelling and measured function are improving. Descending stairs remains limited.

Care and plan

• Reviewed exercise technique and progressed the balance exercise within tolerance.
• Continue the home program and review in one week.
• Earlier reassessment discussed for increasing pain or swelling, a new injury, numbness or weakness.

The example makes the comparison point explicit: a progress note describes what changed over time, while its internal headings can be adapted to the work.

Common errors and how to amend a clinical note

Common documentation errors include copying old information forward without confirming it, mixing patient-reported information with observed findings, leaving responsibility or timing out of the plan, and adding later knowledge as though it was available during the consult.

When a signed note needs correction or more information:

1. Preserve an auditable original. Use the authorised correction or addendum workflow so the original entry and the change remain traceable. Do not silently overwrite the signed record.
2. Identify the real dates. Record the date and time the amendment is made, the author and the date of the encounter or original entry. A late entry should be labelled as late.
3. State what changed and why. Link the correction to the original entry and make the corrected fact clear without rewriting unrelated content.
4. Keep later information in its proper chronology. Label information received after the consult with its source and date. Do not present it as something known when the original decision was made.

Avant's correction guidance advises that later updated or disputed information should generally be documented in a new contemporaneous note that refers to the earlier entry. The method for correcting an error depends on the error, jurisdiction and record setting. For doctors, the Medical Board code requires changes and additions to medical records to be dated.

Privacy law also requires reasonable steps to correct inaccurate, out-of-date, incomplete, irrelevant or misleading personal information. Under Australian Privacy Principle (APP) 13, the reasonable method can depend on the circumstances and other record-keeping requirements, and may involve an addition, alteration or deletion. A universal “never delete” rule is therefore too broad. The correction method must fit the record system and the privacy, health-record and retention requirements that apply.

Review clinical notes before sign-off

A note can read fluently and still contain a clinically important error. Use a consistent review sequence:

1. Identity and context: correct patient, date, author, consultation mode and note type.
2. Safety-sensitive facts: allergies, medicine names and doses, numbers, dates, laterality, investigation results and relevant negatives.
3. Clinical meaning: reported information, observed findings and assessment remain distinct, with no contradiction between them.
4. Plan and ownership: actions, responsible people, timing, follow-up and safety-netting are clear.
5. Record quality: the note is relevant, respectful, concise enough to scan and complete enough to support continuing care.

For AI-drafted notes, add an explicit check for five error types: unsupported content, inaccurate details, clinically relevant omissions, irrelevant inclusions and formatting that changes meaning. Our clinical note evaluation framework explains how we assess those dimensions separately instead of reducing note quality to a single score.

When AI drafts the clinical note

An AI scribe can turn an ambient clinical conversation, a dictated summary or typed points into a structured draft. The clinician still supplies the judgement, adds information that was not captured, edits the draft and signs off the final record.

Within our clinical AI platform, the clinical notes workflow supports ambient capture, dictation and typed notes in one record. Lyrebird can structure the draft as SOAP, a progress note or a custom template, ready for clinician review.

During early use, adapt templates for reviewability with clear headings and prompts for information clinicians repeatedly need to check or supply. This may make review easier; it does not make a draft complete or accurate.

The distinction between draft and final record matters. In the 16-week Gold Coast evaluation of Lyrebird across 100 clinicians and 7,499 outpatient consultations, 84% of the 43 staff survey respondents reported a positive effect on efficiency and 47% reported seeing a hallucination at least once. Among 18 matched pairs, ambient drafts averaged 37.06/40 on the modified Physician Documentation Quality Instrument (PDQI-9), versus 34.56/40 for clinician-written notes. The single-site design and small note-quality sample limit how widely the findings apply. Together, the results show the potential value of ambient documentation and the need for routine clinician review.

What an AI scribe may not capture

An ambient scribe works from available audio and connected context. It may miss or misstate:

• examination findings that were observed but not spoken
• external results or earlier records reviewed silently
• a diagnosis or differential considered internally
• speaker identity, medicine names, doses, dates, measurements or laterality
• changes in meaning caused by negation, uncertainty or chronology

Where appropriate, articulate relevant assessment and plan information during the consult instead of leaving it unspoken. This may improve the source material, but cannot guarantee a complete draft. Clinicians must still add silent observations and record context, then ensure the final note reflects the encounter and their judgement rather than the transcript alone.

Consent and privacy still apply

Clinical notes contain health information, which the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner treats as sensitive information. The Guide to health privacy covers collection, use, disclosure, access, correction and security obligations for health service providers.

Before an AI scribe captures a consult, explain how it will be used and complete and record the consent process required for that workflow, setting and jurisdiction. The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) guidance places responsibility on the healthcare professional to obtain informed consent and verify information entered into the patient record. Practice policy should also define approved tools, data handling, fallback documentation and incident reporting.

Frequently asked questions

How long should a clinical note be?

There is no useful universal word count. A note should contain the relevant information needed to understand the encounter, reasoning and plan, while remaining easy to scan. Complexity, risk and the requirements of the service determine the necessary detail.

Are SOAP notes required in Australia?

SOAP is widely understood, but it is not the only acceptable structure. The note format should meet the professional, workplace and service requirements that apply, and make the clinical information easy for another practitioner to understand.

Are clinical notes and progress notes the same?

“Clinical notes” is the broader term. Progress notes are clinical notes that document changes in a patient's condition, treatment or response over time. Other clinical notes include consultation, procedure, admission and discharge notes.

Can patients read their clinical notes?

Patients generally have a right to request access to health information held about them, subject to limited exceptions. The OAIC explains that this access generally includes notes of clinical interactions. Clear, respectful language supports both patient trust and clinical communication.

Draft clinical notes with Lyrebird

Safe clinical documentation starts with clinician judgement and reliable review. Lyrebird helps Australian clinicians capture a consult and prepare a structured draft, so attention can stay with the patient while the clinician controls the record.

Contact us